From Our South Africa Correspondent
[spacer height=”5px”]
Dear Hell in Suburbia
[spacer height=”5px”]
Well, I think your loyalty motive for sitting on this information shows that you do, in fact, still possess all the shiniest moral tools to solve this problem.
[spacer height=”5px”]
As it relates to you alone, the answer is quite simple, and I’m sure others in this column will make it clear. In fact, it would only be a real quandary if Maria was your enemy.
[spacer height=”5px”]
But if you’d like to fix this whole mess, and turn it into a positive – I mean closure for Maria, self-respect for Ginny, a clear conscience for you, and a deeper friendship for the three of you – then you need to be prepared to confess that it was you who killed the dog.
[spacer height=”5px”]
Let me tell you why.
[spacer height=”5px”]
I’m from South Africa, and the tool that we South Africans supposedly use to solve tough ethical quandaries is called “ubuntu.” Its literal definition is “human kindness,” but the South African version is more like a deal; a social contract with a slightly selfish incentive: “I get to regard myself as fully human only in terms of my recognition for your humanity.”
[spacer height=”5px”]
In other words: we need to freely join friends like Ginny in the moral trench, and climb out together.
[spacer height=”5px”]
We either belong to each other, or don’t belong at all.
[spacer height=”5px”]
Desmond Tutu says that we, as individuals, “are diminished when others (strangers) are humiliated or diminished,” and that we therefore have the ultimate incentive to remedy the distress in others.
[spacer height=”5px”]
It also requires that we don’t smugly look to ourselves as exemplars.
[spacer height=”5px”]
So a good example is Linda Biehl, mother of the American student Amy Biehl. Amy was brutally murdered in apartheid South Africa while doing anti-apartheid work in the run-up to my country’s first democratic elections. Biehl’s murderers were later given amnesty at the Truth & Reconciliation Commission. But here’s the ubuntu kicker: when one killer later got married in Cape Town, Linda flew out for the ceremony – and danced with the groom.
[spacer height=”5px”]
Linda Biehl defines the moral toughness needed for ubuntu’s big picture benefits.
[spacer height=”5px”]
Linda Biehl has said that she discovered personal freedom in forgiving her daughter’s four killers, and much more in actively loving them, and receiving their love. They call her “Makulu,”which means “wise woman.” She and her husband have since co-founded a foundation to help disadvantaged people like Amy’s killers become “functional young people.”
[spacer height=”5px”]
I suspect that most writers in this column will be advising you to talk candidly, and lovingly, with Ginny. To encourage her to confess to Maria. And they’d be right.
[spacer height=”5px”]
But the stakes will hinge on how you frame this conversation.
[spacer height=”5px”]
The ubuntu-esque approach to this might be to kick off that conversation with Ginny by telling her you love her; by recounting your gratitude for the good deeds she has done in the past; and to declare that you feel no judgment toward her, no matter what she decides to do.
[spacer height=”5px”]
To explain to her why it is so important that Maria find closure, in knowing who was driving the car that hit Shackleton. And then to tell her that, out of love for both your friends, you are sincerely willing to tell Maria it was you who hit her dog.
[spacer height=”5px”]
It’s up to Ginny.
[spacer height=”5px”]
The ubuntu theory is that Ginny would break down in cathartic tears; rediscover her own humanity through yours, and go confess to Maria in a second round of tearful emotion, where she would cite your selfless offer as the reason for her coming clean, and turning over a new leaf.
[spacer height=”5px”]
There must surely be a reason why Ginny—someone you clearly respect otherwise—would drive away from the scene of an accident. Perhaps she carries the trauma of some past incident. Or perhaps her relationship with Maria was already on thin ice, and she thought silence the only way to preserve it. Hopefully, she would confess the foundation of her moral flaw to Maria, and this vulnerability would trigger new empathy in Maria.
[spacer height=”5px”]
Perhaps she’d offer to find a new canine companion for Maria, and offer to walk it every week.
[spacer height=”5px”]
Of course: There are a grand total of maybe two South Africans who might actually take this blame-ownership approach: Nelson Mandela or Desmond Tutu.
[spacer height=”5px”]
Most of the rest of us? We’d march over to Ginny’s driveway, scrape a swab of dog fur from the front grille of her SUV, knock on her door, and say: “WTF, sister? Seriously? Get your ass over to Maria’s and fess up, or this fur will fly.”
[spacer height=”5px”]
And that’s the best of us. The worst might drop that fur sample into an evidence bag, and extort the keys to that SUV from Ginny, in exchange for sitting on that devastating information.
[spacer height=”5px”]
Still, at least the example of the moral generosity of a Tutu or a Biehl may allow you to consider the context behind Ginny’s behavior.
[spacer height=”5px”]
Like I said: we South Africans can be as cynical as anyone else.
[spacer height=”5px”]
So it’s really an American mother’s example you may wish to follow. South Africans simply know why.